19-14=3

When 19-14=3 ,
19=17 , as the Right moves Leftwards,
Unharming the \mathbb{R} line nor logic,
But invalidating the premise itself.
An \neq would convert to = if
We change our original stance.

When 19-14=3 ,
14=16 , as the Left moves Rightwards,
Unvanquishing the linearity of \mathbb{R},
By tweaking the premise itself.
An error would automatically rectify if
We decide to move ahead.

When 19-14=3 ,
x=\frac{5}{3}x \ \forall\ x \in \mathbb{R} , as the range contracts,
Completely deforming and twirling the \mathbb{R} into an Accordion-
A never-ending coiling of an Accordion, x_n= \left(\frac{5}{3}\right)^n x_0 .
The coiling becomes so dense that-
Despite reaching 19 in three integral steps, if we get lost in between,
we’d never reach the terminals 14 or 19 till eternity.
A blunder could be blemished by patching over it, but
We must burden the consequences and spiraling regrets upon us.

When 19-14=3 ,
2 elements from \{15,16,17,18\} will be kicked out,
Bearing holes in the interval [14,19] ,
A random action that untangles a network of possibilities.
If Neighbours : 15 & 16
We’d kick out the integers, and the set \{ x \in \mathbb{R}\ |\ floor(x)=15\ OR\ 16 \} ,
Creating a single big hole in the [14,19] continuum.
Alternating neighbours : 15 & 17
Create two holes in the [14,19] continuum.
Cousins like 15.4 & 16.5
Create two tenth of a hole in the [14,19] continuum,
And hence we need to kick ten set of cousins out,
And we get twenty holes in the continuum
Strangers like 5\pi , \sqrt{67 e^3}\ \log_{10}3
Create uncountable holes in the continuum;
If the Strangers are rational, the hole count would be
N=\ \sum^m_{i=1}{10^{\psi \left(a_i \right)}}\qquad \forall\ a_i\ \in \mathbb{Q}
and \psi(x) provides the number of significant figures in x , and
The [14,19] continuum would look like MacBeth written in freakin’ Morse Code.
If irrational, then \lim_{x \in \bar{\mathbb{Q}}} \psi(x)=\infty ,
The number of holes would go berzerk, and it ain’t pretty!
In the course of masking a glitch, we’d end up having
Infinitesimally significant infinite casualties.

When 19-14=3 ,
Two sets of 2 elements from {15,16,17,18} will be clubbed together,
Forming kinks / hills on the existing \mathbb{R} continuum,
Resulting in a chaotic range of hills in the entire number line.
15 will be divisible by 4 , and 16 will be divisible by 5 ,
Blackjack would become a terrible gambling game,
Providing more probabilistic advantage to the Player than the Dealer.
17 will stop being a prime number, OR
Both 17 and 18 will be prime numbers.
Neighbours: (15,\ 16),\ (16,\ 17) would create one hill on the continuum.
Alternating Neighbours; create two hills on the continuum.
Cousins; create twenty hills on the continuum.
The determining the number of hills would be similar to that of number of holes, and
The [14,19] continuum would look like an ECG of a Methhead doing Gangnam Style.
In the course of covering a screw-up, we’d end up producing
A plethora of consequences along with it.

A mistake, an error, a fuck-up has transformed a simple relation
Into a messy, chaotic, scary monstrosity.
Actually, justification of the said mistake has created the chaos.
However, it has been agreed from the start that 19-14=3
Is a mistake, and I have been trying to justify the consequences.

But, is it still a mistake just because it leads to chaos?
Because of how convoluted, and topologically inequivalent
The number line would become, does that make it a blunder?
Why do we yet expect things to run smooth and linear,
When the entire existence and reality are consequences of chaos?

Sometimes, alcohol is the solution.
If you have 19\ ltr of alcohol, and
I borrow 14\ ltr from you,
You’ll be left with 3\ kg of alcohol.

I’ll be hungover for the next whole week, and
19-14=3 .